360° Biz Blog

My Random Musings On Business

Browsing Posts published by Deepthi Bathina

This is the career related topic we discussed at the kickoff event of the 2012 BPMA Executive Council. We usually discuss one Marketing or Product Management related topic and one career related topic at our executive meetings. We have several reputable executives in our council and these points were based on all our personal experiences.

  • Going the extra mile Seeking out challenges proactively, not waiting to be asked to do something. 
  • Be results oriented – At the end of the day, results matter.  
  • Build your brand – What do you want to be known for internally and externally?  continue reading…

Last week we kicked off the 2012 BPMA Executive Council with a group of 26 highly qualified and accomplishment executives and product managers from ~24 different companies.  As always, we had a great discussion on topics related to product management and career growth. One of the interesting topics we discussed was the impact of social media on product management. Early on we clarified that social media for outbound marketing is different from social media for product management – this discussion is about the latter. We discussed that it is important to decide on what exactly you want to achieve using social media before you go down that route.  Focus on what exactly you want accomplished and then see how you can get there using social media.  Overall, collective wisdom is that social media is a powerful tool, but it cannot replace internal product strategy and it is best used as a supplement to traditional market research

Broadly, social media can be used by product managers to facilitate with the following:

  • Gather customer feedback
    • Gives voice to a customer in an informal way (tools such as twitter, LinkedIn group discussions etc).
    • It is nearly impossible to act upon all customer feedback, you need to pick those that align with your overall corporate strategy.  However it is important to ensure that the customer’s pain-point/feedback is ‘addressed’ in some way. One method that always worked for me is to be upfront with the customers to let them know that their feedback will be validated through other market research methods before making its way to the roadmap.
  • Internal Problem solving
    • Some examples were mentioned wherein an internal problem was discussed using the intra-company social media and a resolution was reached much faster as a result of reaching a wider audience.
    • Involving senior level executives usually helps is gathering attention to a internal social media venture.
  • Metrics & measurement continue reading…

So, what do you think? Can one person really make a difference in your career? If you’re like most people, your answer was no.  You are probably wrong.  If you can find the right mentor for you, the difference they can make in your career is huge and their impact on your professional life will be invaluable. “The value of a good mentor is immeasurable when it comes to learning the tricks of the trade as well as becoming connected to the professional world in your industry..”

Over the last couple of years, several people asked me why I built the Executive Council and the Mentorship Program at BPMA. The main reason is to “give back”. Over the last decade, fortunately, I had a couple of great mentors in my professional life.  They have been my supporters, advisors, challengers, sounding boards and generous experts. When I advise various professionals and students to get a mentor, many say “Where do you find these mentors? How do you even ask them to be your mentor? It just does not come easily to me”. Mentors may or may not be from the same company you work at – they could be  industry leaders you meet at various events and programs, they could be your alumni, they could be someone you just admire for their professional achievements. I have proactively contacted leaders I admire because I needed their advice and wanted to learn from their experiences. Over the last decade, I have also been a mentor to several motivated professionals who approached me and it is always a rewarding experience to guide my mentees and to see them accomplish great things.

In recent years, I met continue reading…

Both Kodak and Fuji were similar – both enjoyed lucrative near-monopolies of their home markets.  Kodak selling film in America and Fujifilm in Japan. Both firms saw their traditional business rendered obsolete. However, due to key strategic moves, Fuji transformed into a solid profitable business with a market cap of 12.6 B to Kodak 220 M.  Why did one wither and the other do so well? I recently happened to discuss this topic with a colleague in the context of companies who successfully moved into diverse markets and then, came across a related article in the latest ‘The Economist (Jan 14-20) 2012.’ Here are some highlights based on the article and my discussions.

A culture of complacency - Despite of all Kodak’s strengths including its resources, R&D, good relations in the local community, they had become a complacent monopolist. Fuji exposed this weakness by aggressively moving into the American market.

Executive mindset – Kodak executives “suffered from a mentality of perfect products, rather than the high-tech mindset of make-it, launch it, fix it“. They were even slow in acquisitions – even after they decided to diversify, it took them years to make it first acquisition …and never made big enough bets to create break-throughs.

Quick diversification into other markets – Fuji did it more successfully. Film is a bit like skin – both contain collagen.  Both are preserved with anti-oxidants. In Fuji’s library of 200,000 chemical compounds, some 4000 are related to anti-oxidants. So, it launched line of cosmetics, called Astalift, which is sold in Asia and being launched in Europe this year.

Fuji  also leveraged its core strengths of film. It made investment  into optical films for LCD flat panel screens, which paid off very well.  (Fuji now enjoys 100% market share in one sort of film).

Stopping one step short of disruption – Kodak’s CEO (1993-1999), George Fisher, cranked out digital cameras and offered clients ability to post and share pictures online. “A brilliant boss might have turned this idea into something like Facebook“, But Mr. Fisher was not that boss. continue reading…

I have not attended MITX (The Massachusetts Innovation & Technology Exchange) events prior to Dec 2011, but it is a great organization to be involved with. Emily Green, Chairman of Yankee Group, reached out to me last year regarding MITX and I was recently invited as a judge to the 16th Annual MITX Annual Awards. I should say it was quite an interesting experience! The award event was a very fancy (and fun!) event at Sheraton Boston starring John Michael Higgins (the hilarious Hollywood star), where I was able to meet with many interesting marketing organizations.

We received entries from companies ranging from small local firms to Fortune 500 firms. My category to judge was mainly focused on digital marketing strategies and it was great to see how many companies from several industries are leveraging cutting digital strategies to increase their revenues and brand presence. Based on the entries I evaluated, here are the most popular result oriented digital strategies deployed by companies to promote their products and services in the new social media era.

Social causes: Many companies tried to link their campaign to “give back” or “social service” causes which seem to resonate well with various segments ranging from teen community to technology professionals.  Some of the companies created socially enabled microsite with highly engaging and fun content featuring interactive polls, quizzes, video PSA’s, and sweepstakes. Few months ago, I attended Oracle Open World and it was interesting to see how Salesforce attracted many people to its booth through this same strategy. (According to their facebook, Hundreds of Oracle World Conference 2011 attendees visited the Salesforce Foundation booth to give their time to support four worthy organizations: Project NightNight, Playworks, UCSF and WorldVision).

Social media connectivity: For some companies, user experience experts streamlined the website’s navigational structure, making website exploration and social media integration seamless. Social media integration throughout the website enables visitors to share site content with their social communities, thus greatly extending the reach.

Involve influencers in the industry: A key driving strategy which some companies used was to directly involve influential people or celebrities in the campaign. Promotional videos with celebrities were used online – across social channels like YouTube and on their microsites – and at retail, if relevant. By leveraging multiple channels, they increased and amplified campaign reach and engagement.

Twitter parties: Some companies leveraged influencers to host a Twitter party around the topic core to their campaign, with all of the participating bloggers posting about the product leading to several thousands of total impressions.

Drive consumers to Facebook: One overall strategy which companies used was to drive consumers to a Facebook application that would drive them to the online store, and vice versa. Some chose to use Facebook as a platform because more than half (53.5%) of Facebook users are aged 18-34 – if the age range is part of your target audience, this will be a great strategy for your company. For example, one particular retail company created a custom Facebook application that would track votes. The school with the most votes in 30 days would host the concert of their favorite star. Programs like this will give reciprocal relationship between e-commerce sites and their Facebook presence– giving current and potential customers incentive to not only purchase products/services, but to engage with the brand.

Leverage online games: If you are looking for ideas that play to the “adventure” feel as well as the “fun” feel of your target audience, online games can help you. Develop virtual applications with fun game elements, add layers of daily contest and a sweepstakes on the game to help encourage repeat play and visits. One popular example of this strategy is Dunkin Donuts facebook game where users can blast ice by controlling virtual water cannons. Click here to read more about it.The 4 week program garnered over hundreds of thousands of entries in the game, millions of Facebook impressions and PR impressions.

Mobile marketing campaigns: The mobile market is big and growing. There are over 400 million 3g wireless subscribers worldwide, with 101 million in Europe and 135 million in North America (source: ITFacts.biz). Mobile Internet usage indexes highest among affluent users who are target prospects for some companies. Companies could develop relevant iphone apps that appease to the core target market. Some companies have forged strong partnerships with mobile device manufacturers to cross-promote their various applications for different platforms.

Results measured by…. continue reading…

Understanding customer needs is extremely critical to develop a successful product. During my first week at one of the companies I previously worked at, the Director of Development at that time asked me “Here is the product we developed, could you please let us know what the value of it is to our customers?” Yes, I was as shocked as you must be right now. Would you develop a product and “hope” that it solves some kind of a market problem? Or would you rather understand your customer needs as the very first step and actually develop something to solve their problem? With the latter, there is no hoping and praying, you know your work is worth it. This is your answer to the “Why” (Why should I care about the Voice-of-the-Client?) question.

Though there are several qualitative and quantitative methods to understand customer needs, for today’s discussion, I would like to focus on the formal Voice of the Client (VOC) method that you could use to understand your customer needs. VOC is a qualitative research approach and as such, findings from this work are directional and subjective in nature.

Let me get something straight before you raise your hand to sign up for this at work- it will take a lot of time and energy to do the formal Voice of the Customer (VOC) session, and even more time to follow-up on the strategic initiatives that may result from this session. This is no trivial task that you could do in your “spare time”.

Key aspects that you need to understand about VOC:

Three core principles of VOC are 1) Developing 360 degree view of your business 2)Understanding context from your customer’s aspect and 3)Recognizing “by chance” opportunities (you don’t know what you don’t know – be as open minded as possible)

Who? (Who should you interview?) First and foremost, identify your strategic objective to drive the Voice of the Client session. Then ‘who’ should be interviewed for the VOC session will easily come to you. Current customers are the primary source of information if your aim is to understand the current market. Potential customers are the primary source if your objective is to explore an adjacent market or to enter a completely new market. If you are choosing current customer, make sure you invite both the happy ones and the disgruntled ones to make sure the results are not skewed one way or the other.

How many? (How many interviews) The number varies and is typically determined by the type of product, complexity of your market, number of current clients continue reading…

 
Couple of weeks ago, I attended an event where Pragmatic Marketing’s Steve Johnson was the speaker. It was a very interactive conversation and Steve asked the attendees a question while discussing win/loss analysis – “if you asked your sales people, what is the biggest reason for their losses, what would they answer?”, the attendees unanimously answered “product”, he then asked “from sales perspective, what would be the next big reason for losses?”, the crowd had another unanimous answer “price”. Now, he asked “what is the biggest reason for wins?” The answer ofcourse is “sales execution” ;-) The group included around 100+ product managers and marketers from companies of various sizes and industries.

I was laughing out loud because it was funny in a way to see how so many companies were facing the same exact perception problem I faced through years of my experience.
Based on my good, bad and the ugly experiences with the win/loss analysis over the past decade, here are three ways to do the win/loss analysis and one way of presenting the final analysis that could offend your sales team – so stay away from it!
 
I recommend the first method outlined below for your win/loss analysis. The other two have a big caveat – the data will be skewed by sales perceptions, but hey, something is better than nothing!
 
Method1 – 3rd party firm:
Hire a 3rd party firm to interview the clients/prospects directly about the wins and losses. You can set the standard questionnaire in advance. I know how tempting it is for you to be on that call, but please don’t. Answers will be skewed once the customer knows that you are on the call. However, the 3rd party interviewer will let the client know that this interview is being done for your company. Here is one firm I used in the past and they do a good job: www.primary-intel.com (no, they did not sponsor this blog to get a good review, referring them here only because of their good work!).

Pro:
Third party analysis based on client interviews is the most unbiased data you can get.
Con:
Getting all the win/loss data to the 3rd party firm promptly can be tough. Do not rely on your sales people to keep sending all the contact info for their wins and losses to the 3rd party firm. Figure out a way to send the data to the firm directly – I had one of my employees collect the data from salesforce and email it directly to the firm and it worked well.

Method2 – sales interviews:
You could interview sales people about each of the deals.

Pro:
You will get a lot of more insight into the deals, pipeline, sales process and customer problems during these in-depth interviews. continue reading…

With 26 executives and managers from product management and marketing community from the Boston area, we launched the 2011 BPMA Executive council last week. Executives and managers come from 24 different companies ranging from corporate firms like CA, ADP, Cisco, Fidelity to start-ups like Netprospex, Centage and Ankota. The group comes from diverse backgrounds and industries, which enables us to have rich conversations loaded with great information and experiences. We had some interesting discussions about a couple of product strategy topics and career topics. Here is the summary of one of the topics:  Can your idea become a viable product or service? Once you determine the answer is yes, a business plan needs to be developed to further validate your analysis. The following points will give you an idea of the initial list of factors to be considered.

  • Does it fit your company’s Core competencies? The idea should be in line with the core competencies of the company- sometimes it may or may not be aligned with today’s strategy of the company.
  • Do you have the right resources to execute? Product Manager should think of resources that are required for implementing the idea – can your company afford it today, ecosystem fit etc.
  • Need-Pay-Urgency-Pervasive: It is just not enough for idea to be “cool”, but product management should bring in the perspective – does it really solve any key market problem?  Is the market ready to pay for this product/service? How urgent is the problem to be solved? How pervasive? etc.
  • Opportunity Cost: Consider what the company will have to stop doing if this opportunity is pursued – opportunity cost, cannibalization effect etc.
  • Budget cycle and investment plans don’t always match. continue reading…

One of the topics discussed at our recent Executive Council event is to understand what helps your career the most – is it who you know or what you know? Based on the collective wisdom, here are some key points:

                                                                                                     

You need both: Most of the opinion was to have a combination of both the “What” and “Who”. The “What” part is required to give you credibility in your community. Whereas the “Who” part will create the opportunities to grow further.

Inside and outside: The “Who” part will help you with recommendations, references within and outside the company. “What” part is important for what you are known for, both inside and outside the company.

Sometimes the least expected gets picked up, so to take advantage of it – always, do your best! One of the CMOs seated at my table mentioned that this is especially true when presenting to the Board of Directors since you never know when they may be impressed with your performance and what opportunities it may lead to.

Attend atleast one networking event per month: Attending external conferences, forging relationships outside your department, being the voice of the customer within the company will help you grow in the long-term as well as in the short-term. continue reading…

How many of us can actually run a full page ad like this? Taco Bell’s confidence is admirable to do this in response to the recent law suit claim that their beef taco filling doesn’t actually contain all that much meat (whether they are really thankful or not is a whole different story..).

Three things that Taco Bell did well to ward off the lawsuit crisis:

  • Be confident- Straight forward and confident message from their President Greg Creed posted on their website played to their favor- establishing credibility is extremely important in crisis scenarios like this.
  • Act fast- “lie repeated often enough becomes the truth” – Taco bell aggressively curbed it right from the start; don’t delay the action!
  • Reach out wide- Social media is the way to go for this – Taco Bell used twitter, blogging, you tube video (As I write this, it has 125,225 hits) to clarify their stance. Taco Bell set a text book example of how best to leverage social media to avert media crisis like this.

Be ready to see a case study on Taco Bell for crisis management!